Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) as a Treatment for Liver Transplant Candidates
Choose Your Language:

Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) as a Treatment for Liver Transplant Candidates

Summary (10 sec read)

Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (Y-90) is a crucial treatment for liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It effectively downstages tumors, prevents progression during wait times, and improves post-transplant survival. TARE outperforms TACE, offering better tolerance, fewer side effects, and enhanced cost-effectiveness.

Transarterial Radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (Y-90) is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients awaiting liver transplantation. By delivering targeted radiation to tumors via the hepatic artery, TARE reduces tumor size while preserving surrounding liver tissue, making it a valuable downstaging and bridging therapy option for transplant candidates.

TARE’s Role in Downstaging and Bridging to Transplantation

Liver transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for patients with HCC, but due to the scarcity of donor organs, candidates often wait months or even years. Tumor progression during this waiting period can make patients ineligible for transplantation. TARE helps prevent tumor growth, ensuring that patients remain within transplant eligibility criteria.
• A study in The Oncologist highlighted that TARE successfully downstages 30%–50% of patients with intermediate and advanced HCC, allowing them to meet the Milan or UCSF criteria for transplantation (https://academic.oup.com/oncolo/article/29/2/117/7490834).
• Research published in Radiographics found that TARE-treated patients had significantly lower dropout rates from transplant waitlists compared to those receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) (https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/rg.2021210014).
• According to a PubMed Central (PMC) study, TARE resulted in a 45% reduction in tumor burden, significantly increasing transplant eligibility (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5497664/).

By effectively controlling tumor progression, TARE enhances the probability of successful transplantation, providing a crucial advantage over other locoregional therapies.

Survival and Recurrence Rates Post-Transplantation

Post-transplant survival and tumor recurrence are major concerns for HCC patients undergoing pre-transplant therapies. Studies indicate that TARE not only extends survival before transplantation but also enhances long-term post-transplant outcomes.
• A study published in J Liver Cancer reported that patients who underwent TARE before liver transplantation exhibited a 5-year survival rate exceeding 70%, similar to non-cancerous transplant recipients (https://www.e-jlc.org/journal/view.php?number=489).
• Another PMC study found that “TARE-treated patients had a reduced recurrence rate of 15%–20% post-transplant, compared to 25%–30% for patients receiving TACE (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5497664/).
• Research from The Oncologist also showed that TARE has a longer median survival of 30 months compared to 16 months with TACE” (https://academic.oup.com/oncolo/article/29/2/117/7490834).

The ability of TARE to not only extend survival but also lower recurrence rates post-transplant makes it a preferred therapy for patients awaiting transplantation.

Advantages Over Other Locoregional Therapies

TARE has distinct benefits over conventional locoregional treatments such as TACE and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
• Lower Side Effect Profile: Unlike TACE, which causes post-embolization syndrome (fever, nausea, and severe pain), TARE is better tolerated, with fewer complications (https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/rg.2021210014).
• Preservation of Liver Function: According to J Liver Cancer, “TARE minimizes damage to non-cancerous liver tissue, making it a safer choice for patients with borderline liver function (https://www.e-jlc.org/journal/view.php?number=489).
• Improved Tumor Control: A meta-analysis in PMC reported that “TARE-treated patients had a median overall survival of 19–30 months, compared to 11–16 months for TACE patients (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5497664/).

These advantages make TARE an essential tool for managing HCC in transplant candidates.

TARE as a Cost-Effective Option

Apart from its clinical benefits, TARE is also a cost-effective option for HCC patients.
• A Radiographics study noted that “TARE reduces the need for repeated hospitalizations and additional procedures, lowering overall treatment costs (https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/rg.2021210014).
• Research in The Oncologist found that “TARE requires fewer sessions compared to TACE, resulting in fewer hospital visits and lower financial burden on patients (https://academic.oup.com/oncolo/article/29/2/117/7490834).

Given the high costs associated with liver transplantation, the ability of TARE to improve outcomes while reducing expenses makes it an attractive option for both patients and healthcare providers.

Conclusion: A Critical Tool for Liver Transplant Candidates

TARE with Y-90 is a transformative therapy for liver transplant candidates, offering multiple advantages:
• Effective downstaging, enabling patients to qualify for transplantation.
• Bridging therapy benefits, preventing tumor progression during long waitlist periods.
• Superior post-transplant outcomes, with increased survival rates and lower recurrence risks.
• Better tolerance and fewer side effects compared to other locoregional therapies.
• Cost-effectiveness, reducing hospitalizations and financial burdens.

Given these benefits, TARE should be a primary treatment consideration for HCC patients seeking liver transplantation. Its ability to prolong survival, improve transplant eligibility, and enhance post-transplant outcomes makes it a critical component in modern liver cancer management.

Sources:

https://nuclearmedicinetherapy.in/post/tare-for-liver-cancer-3-reasons-tare-is-beneficial-for-liver-cancer-patients-waiting-for-a-liver-transplant
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4882351/
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5497664/

https://academic.oup.com/oncolo/article/29/2/117/7490834
https://www.e-jlc.org/journal/view.php?number=489
https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/rg.2021210014

Consult Dr Ishita B Sen

Get in
touch with us

BOOK AN APPOINTMENT

Disclaimer: This information is intended for general knowledge and informational purposes only, and does not constitute medical advice. Please consult with a qualified healthcare professional for any medical concerns or treatment decisions.